Jersey City and the World Cup: Spain vs. The Netherlands at O’Hara’s Downtown

By • Jul 12th, 2010 • Category: Arts, Featured, News

An ongoing series on how Jersey City soccer fans — and those who aren’t — watch the games.

That loud friend in a group of friends is animatedly rehashing the A-Rod/Dallas Braden controversy in O’Hara’s Downtown — this despite the 10 or so wide-screen HD televisions showing the final match of the World Cup, despite the mostly filled bar of Spanish and Dutch loyalists, even if just for the time being. There is a practiced emphasis in his storytelling, and his friends, who likely don’t closely follow baseball if they haven’t heard this story already, are laughing politely at the details. He’s louder than the announcers’ voices coming from the television sets, louder than the vuvuzelas that are criticized beyond their minor inconveniences. The match’s action, in particular what at this point in the game already feels like futile attempts at scoring a goal and the crowd’s emphatic reactions, give pause to his storytelling, but just for a moment. It seems that some sports fans will not be persuaded by soccer under just about any circumstances.

Meanwhile, one fan (finally someone louder than the storyteller) is calling “bullshit” on one of the 14 yellow cards in total given by British referee Howard Webb (who just so happens to be a police officer when not working the pitch). There are pockets of protest at this, and also pockets of cheers, but no interaction in between the two groups. It’s unclear just how much “bullshit” is involved in the call until further examination of the replays show the Netherland’s Nigel de Jong’s flying jump kick landing spikes-first into the chest of Spain’s Xabi Alonso with no hope of hitting the ball. This is the kind of ugly, dangerous play that should be solidly in red card territory, which the announcers acknowledge and that the referee has apparently missed. But other than the quieting of the Dutch fan protest, there isn’t much in the way of outrage among the attendees.

In a decent sized bar, the cohesion necessary for shared viewership, in particular for soccer, seems somewhat absent here. Which isn’t meant to suggest that O’Hara’s, one of the more traditional sports bars in Jersey City, is lacking in any significant way. Note again the walls of wide-screen HD televisions, the beer specials (those $2 Coors Light draughts for the World Cup, for one), the fans who come out in colors (one Spanish fan is flag-adorned), and of course the pub grub, the onion rings and nachos making the rounds. But how then does this layout — a long bar along one wall, round tables with high chairs against another, and more restaurant style seating in the back — translate for watching soccer, as compared to say, sports more closely associated with the U.S.?

Take, for example, Zeppelin Hall, with its long wooden tables crowded with fans out of necessity of space, and the various groups of strangers commingling. This isn’t to compare bars so much as to compare how sports are, could and perhaps should be watched.

Baseball — with the tension between batter and pitcher, with slow moments of communication on pitches between the mound and the catcher behind the plate, the crescendo of fans in attendance, the camera cutting to the crowd rising to their feet — is appropriately associated with individual moments. The somewhat isolated tables serviced by the wait staff makes the O’Hara’s layout more appropriate for this, and other sports more closely associated with the U.S. (the stop and starts of football, with numerous and long pauses in between plays, as a second example). But the appreciation of no-look heel passes, of slow midfield possessions like a team of Spain’s style — all the little things worth noting in a low scoring sport like soccer — doesn’t translate in the spaciousness of some sports bars.

It is not until the end of the game, when the second yellow card, thus making it a red, is given to the Netherland’s John Heitinga, that the bar starts to show more signs of life. The replay of his shoulder-pushing takedown of Xavi Hernandez of Spain looks, as another fan says, “like [Xavi] is a puppet on a string.” The first fan, encouraged and encouraging in his outrage, adds, “This game is fucking fixed.” Meanwhile, one can imagine that the Spanish fans, on the whole more numerous and vocal than the Dutch fans in the bar, were thinking back to the lack of red for the Netherland’s de Jong and his flying jump kick.

So went grace as well as some of the ostensible good will between nations’ fans that the World Cup hopes to inspire, but at least the individual spectatorship in the bar finally began to break down. Too little, too late, however, as another World Cup wraps up.

And so Spain has their first World Cup title, while the Netherlands takes home their third failed finals bid. And, of course, Germany’s oracle octopus’ perfect record edges its way from the novel to the slightly unsettling.

For the time being daytime sports-watching comes to an unfortunate end. Which, coincidentally, means those 10 am bar visits that fall somewhere along the gradient of “acceptability” slowly shift in the other direction, and “dedicated fan” becomes “dedicated drinker,” both of which were found, and frequently, in these updates. Well, this is the way of things, for sure. Whether you watched the games at a bar, or on ESPN3 or univision.com’s stream at work, or a friend’s, you have four more years to wait.

In the meantime, we do in fact have a league in progress here, and your second place New York Red Bulls have games but a PATH ride away. Something to think about on those long commutes to work suffering from World Cup withdrawal.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Like what you've read here? Please consider making a donation or becoming a sustaining member. As a grassroots news organization, we rely on community support -- as well as paid advertising -- to survive.

is a staff writer for the Jersey City Independent.
Email this author | All posts by

  • James Young

    I was that loud asshole (or at least half of a two-person asshole with my buddy.) For the record, the story was more-so an account of how Braden’s mother and grandmother played into the whole moment and how incredible I thought it was. If any of you haven’t heard it, let me know and I’ll swing by and give you the whole shebang. I’m quite practiced and emphatic when it comes to telling it.

    Regardless, my apologies that it left such a lasting mark on your experience. I didn’t realize I was interrupting such a large collection of Spanish and Dutch loyalists at an Irish bar in Jersey City. I hope you were able to enjoy the remainder of the game. I managed to, as did my polite friends.

  • Matt Hunger

    Well James, first off, thanks for reading.

    Perhaps in identifying with the anecdotal opening of the piece, the connection between the use of the anecdote and the purpose of the piece was left by the wayside. No crime that, as I imagine matters more personal were occupying your attention. That being said, in the context of more traditionally American sports (football, baseball, basketball, etc), there are breaks in the action, be it timeouts, or change of possession after downs, or a relief pitcher coming to the mound. In these spaces of non-action there is much more room for discussion, relevant to the game or otherwise, and these are to be encouraged. And as I’m sure you already know that, I’m equally sure you are aware that in soccer there doesn’t exist these same spaces. This, as the piece addresses, leaves less room for idle chatter, innocuous as it may seem to the participants (or even those standing by the participants who aren’t as engaged with the happenings on-screen).

    Further, might I also remind you that by the agency of authorship, and by the nature of minor hyperboles and storytelling, the subjects on the periphery cannot help but lose some of their own agency. In this, I’m afraid, you are the sufferer. That being said, this may be why God invented a comments section. Just a thought.

    Best,
    Matt

  • James Young

    Hey man,

    Your response (and article, really) is a bit much for me to absorb right now. I feel a may need to take a few English Lit refresher courses, then give it another go. Coffee would also likely help. You’re clearly a hell of a writer and it’s cool that putting your talents to use for for the JC locals.

    That said, it’s hard not to jump to defense when you see an article led with a less-than-flattering interpretation of a personal/public moment. I’m sure you’d likely do the same. I do understand the point you are making though and appreciate that you put so much thought into how to convey it.

    Good luck with the writing and music.

  • Ellsworth Toohey

    Dude – you are trying way too hard. It’s soccer, not a Jane Austen festivus.

  • max michaels

    Unnecessarily pompous, wordy, and snarky for an article that could have easily have been titled “Man watches soccer match at bar”. Just my two cents.

  • Matt Hunger

    James: Fair points, and for sure it wasn’t meant in any serious critical way other than to help develop the remainder of the piece. Also, as you say, I’m sure I would jump to my own defense at ad hominem criticisms. To that end…

    So, the JCI, for those following at home, is a kind of “alternative” news source. This would, I think, behoove it to open discussion to areas of sports journalism you might not find in, I don’t know, the Star Ledger (which, it should be said, has excellent sports journalism… but you know, not “alternative,” whatever that means). And thanks for the two cents, Max. I believe we can now re-title the piece for a third time: “Man writes article that entertains / angers readers bored at work.”

  • max michaels

    That title is also effective. Well said.

  • Alan Wright

    So this guy “James Young” was the loudmouth at the Zeppelin Hall game you covered, USA v. Ghana, and then he’s the loudmouth for Spain vs. Netherlands at O’Hara’s as well? Hmmm. I think not. Something tells me this James Young is having a laugh of it. Well played. Or maybe “James Young” is the next “John Q. Public.”

    @ O’Hara’s
    James Young on July 12th, 2010 at 5:50 pm:

    I was that loud asshole (or at least half of a two-person asshole with my buddy.) For the record, the story was more-so an account of how Braden’s mother and grandmother played into the whole moment and how incredible I thought it was. If any of you haven’t heard it, let me know and I’ll swing by and give you the whole shebang. I’m quite practiced and emphatic when it comes to telling it.

    Regardless, my apologies that it left such a lasting mark on your experience. I didn’t realize I was interrupting such a large collection of Spanish and Dutch loyalists at an Irish bar in Jersey City. I hope you were able to enjoy the remainder of the game. I managed to, as did my polite friends.

    @ Zeppelin Hall
    James Young on July 12th, 2010 at 6:44 pm:

    I was that loud asshole (who referenced the GDP of Ghana.) For the record, the statement was based in truth – I’m an international market analyst and I was just trying to provide a counterpoint to the game’s result. If you’re interested in learning more, let me know and I’ll swing by and give you the whole shebang. I’m quite practiced and emphatic when it comes to selling it.

    Regardless, my apologies that it left such a lasting mark on your experience. I didn’t realize I was interrupting such a large collection of American and Ghanian loyalists at a German beer hall in Jersey City. I hope you were able to enjoy the remainder of the game. I managed to, as did my polite friends.