BOE Report: Race, Class, Gentrification and the Epps Contract

By • Aug 12th, 2010 • Category: Featured, News, Politics

Photos: Steve Gold

Jersey City residents and public officials crowded into the small 6th floor conference room of 346 Claremont Ave. last night to share their opinions before the Board of Education (BOE) was expected to cast a vote on the proposed contract of superintendent Charles Epps.

But no such vote was held. As BOE president William DeRosa explained at the close of the meeting, Hudson County superintendent Timothy Brennan’s approval of the contract must be obtained before the board votes on it.

Still, the three-hour public hearing that preceded this announcement exposed fault lines in state, city and community politics that are likely to persist even after the board votes.

State

Epps’ chief opponent in Trenton seems to be education commissioner Bret Schundler, a former mayor of Jersey City and founder of Downtown’s Golden Door Charter School. Schundler was appointed by Gov. Chris Christie, whose education policies, including budget cuts and teacher layoffs, have been the subject of much criticism from educators statewide.

Former BOE member Edward Allen was one of several public officials to speak against both Christie and Schundler at last night’s meeting.

“What we have coming from Trenton is the blind trying to lead the sighted,” said Allen, who contrasted Epps’ status as a veteran educator with the relative inexperience of the governor and his education commissioner. “We should not allow that to happen.”

Gov. Christie’s move to cap superintendent salaries at $100,000 has been less contentious than some of his other education policies, but even this development leaves Epps unaffected, as it does not apply to superintendents overseeing districts with more than 10,000 students. While a salary cap for superintendents of larger districts is also in the works, it would likely apply only to contracts minted after the law is put into effect, thus leaving Epps’ $268,200 salary immune to reduction at least until 2013, when the proposed contract is set to expire.

The proposed contract does not permit any increases in salary and requires that all vacation days be used within the year the are awarded, but many residents present at the meeting were still incensed at the magnitude of the salary and the particulars of some of the perks that accompany it, such as a chauffeured car on loan from the state and retroactive payment for the hundreds of unused sick-days Epps has accumulated since he first started teaching for the district 40 years ago.

City

The attention of city officials was split between state politics and a more local controversy, as former mayor and former BOE member Gerald McCann (at left) alleged that former assistant superintendent Kathy Coyle was already being considered by several board members as a replacement for Epps.

McCann, whose 2010 bid for a seat on the BOE was unsuccessful largely due to the efforts of Ward E councilman Steve Fulop, implied that Coyle had used her connections with Fulop to secure the backing of board members Sue Mack, Carol Lester, Angel Valentin and Sterling Waterman.

According to McCann, Coyle had called on him to enlist the support of Sean Connors and thereby secure a majority within the board. Subsequent speakers, including a dean in Lincoln High School and members of the teachers’ union, said teachers, administrators, and schools suffered under Coyle’s administration. Fulop flatly denied all allegations that he has struck a deal with Coyle or enlisted board members in her support.

Community

The meeting’s array of speakers was divided not only by support or opposition to superintendent Epps but also by race, class and neighborhood affiliation. Likewise, the debate was not only about what should be done regarding Epps’ contract, but also a contentious one about who Jersey City belongs to, and who belongs to Jersey City.

The arguments of those supporting a national search varied — while some ridiculed Epps’ salary as inflated, others, including Matt Schapiro (at right), rhetorically asked the board “why not” undertake a national search.

“Wouldn’t a national search make it even more clear that you are the best candidate?” Schapiro asked of Epps, referencing the previous arguments in support of the superintendent.

“Whose going to pay for it?” an audience member asked, as word traveled through the conference room that a national search could cost anywhere from 50 to 300 thousand dollars.

Other Epps opponents drew attention to the 35 out of 40 Jersey City schools that were deemed not up to standard on at least one of several state measures. One speaker invoked the cases of other large city school districts — notably New York City and Washington, D.C. — that have had success in recruiting non-local experts to turn around failing schools and narrow the achievement gap.

Supporters of Epps outnumbered his opponents, who were for the most part seated in a different part of the conference room. Six students spoke in support of Epps, including two members of the citywide student council.

Several Epps supporters contended that while many Jersey City schools fail to meet state and national standards, Jersey City test scores as a whole have improved under the superintendent’s leadership.

Epps backers praised the superintendent for his long years of involvement with and intimate knowledge of Jersey City schools. This focus on Epps’ local provenance was coupled with questions about the motives of those behind the push for a national search.

“It makes sense that those who have been the beneficiaries of displacement in Jersey City think that the way to promote issues is to raze the field,” said Sandra McIntyre (at right), the daughter of a former Jersey City teacher whose own children are enrolled in Jersey City public schools.

Displacement and gentrification — and the subtexts of class and race — were much at issue throughout the meeting. Epps supporters in the audience noted which speakers lived Downtown, and audience members on both sides of the contract issue were eager to inform each other when an opponent’s children went to charter or private schools.

Felicia Palmer (at left), mother of a 1st grader and PTO president at PS 3, was the only speaker to identify herself as undecided on the contract issue.

She pleaded with Epps, the BOE and the community to focus not on the contract, but on student achievement.

“Regardless of if your contract is extended or not, you’re going to be here another year,” she said.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Like what you've read here? Please consider making a donation or becoming a sustaining member. As a grassroots news organization, we rely on community support -- as well as paid advertising -- to survive.

is a New Jersey native and itinerant adventurer currently based in Jersey City. She works in the education sector in NYC.
Email this author | All posts by

  • Alb

    The Jersey Journal today printed a comment from Baligirl on page 2. Baligirl says Epps supporters said a national search would lead to a new superintendent coming in an replacing existing JCBOE employees.

    Baligirl also says a key issue is that Epps has refused to replace politically connected no-show principals in failing schools.

    I think we can clearly see that the principals in many of the JCBOE schools, including the downtown grade schools, work hard and are committed to improving the schools. But, if it’s true that Epps is protecting underqualified and unqualified workers, and people in no-show jobs, THAT would be scandalous.

    If scores are low, well, scores could be low for all sorts of reasons.

    If Epps is really letting no-good principals slide in this economy, that would be a different matter.

    I think it would be good if someone could figure out how to contact Baligirl and either find supporting evidence for what she’s saying or else, if there is no such evidence, then clear Epps of those allegations. If the allegations are false, or, at least, can’t be backed up by any hard evidence, then it’s important to make it clear that evidence for the allegations does not exist.

  • Sez Who?

    Baligirl is one of NJ.com’s most nonsensical commenters, and all this really shows are the perils of the Jersey Journal’s decision to give its anonymous, inane and often disgusting comments on Page Two of its newspaper.

  • http://www.jerseycityindependent.com Jon Whiten

    @Alb

    “Baligirl also says a key issue is that Epps has refused to replace politically connected no-show principals in failing schools.”

    I think this is one of those “easy to allege, hard as hell to prove” things. And, to echo Sez Who, I’m not sure I would assume that Baligirl has any evidence.

  • Alb

    Baligirl said parent after parent went to failing schools and weren’t able to find a principal to talk to.

    Is the problem that:

    - Baligirl is wrong?

    - The staffs at the schools were protecting the principals from annoying parents, but the principals were actually hard at work?

    - The principals were at work-related meetings offsite?

    - The principals were just plain absent?

    Whatever the answer is: I think Baligirl is the first person to make any kind of specific criticism, true or false, about how Epps is doing his job. I think the people calling for the national search are right, and I think you could argue that the pro-Epps people have proven the critics’ point: all the pro-Epps people seem to care about is protecting patronage jobs and shutting out the people who live downtown.

    But I think the anti-Epps people have been so weak at coming up with specific complaints about *what Epps personally is doing wrong* that they feed the cynicism.

  • Jerry McCann

    The funny thing is the ones who want the national search are totally political people. These are not concerned parents or we would have seen them before at meetings. Two women at the meeting told me that Fulop emailed them and that is why they were there. They had their children in Charter schools not supervised by Epps. Only one parent that spoke for the national search regularly comes to the meetings. We have never even seen these people. The woman who got up and spoke about New York City schools just lied. There is not 476 public high schools and 2000 grammar schools in New York City. Also her number of only 30 failings schools is another outright lie. She said she is concerned about her child’s education. He attends Ethical Community Charter School not the public schools. She taught her child that night how to lie in front of 200 people. Is that the ethics they are teaching? She is 44 years old with a five year old child. She claims she has lived in Jersey City for 26 years. Since she is a “single mother” maybe the first thing should be to introduce him to his father.

  • Stephanie Daniels

    Jerry, since you put it out there, I have to ask you, what’s your motive? Your kids are in college (or have graduated), their kids don’t go to Jersey City district public schools. Must people have kids in the public school system in order to care about the rest of the kids in the city? I don’t and I was there too. I have no stake in the game either, other than that I want every single Jersey City kid to have the opportunity to meet his or her potential academically in order for them to achieve – both for themselves and for the greater community – a higher quality of life. I’m talking about the kids in all the districts, in every neighborhood, of every color and culture. I am not the only one who feels this way. Most of the people who were in that room – including those who would support a national search for the best possible leader of Jersey City Schools would agree. When I hear people like Senator Cunningham and other pols and parents who spoke against a national search get up and admit almost as praise, that Jersey Schools are not “excellent or even great” I have to admire their honesty. What I don’t understand is how that ‘s acceptable.

  • Wink

    “Jerry” teaches the kids it’s ok to be an ex-convict bully. Is this the best shot the HCDO can throw at the reform movement? Sad.

  • http://design.sergiosandino.com Sergio

    @ Jerry McCann: You should be ashamed of yourself. You are doing exactly as your upper management want you to do–you try to belittle people who speak out against a system that EVERYONE knows is corrupt. You were in it yourself, so you cannot sit there and say you don’t believe that.

    Stephanie above is right: this is about a higher quality of life for ALL children of the community and a man who is failing at his job is part of the problem.

    Also, since I have lived in Jersey City only 8 years, as both a renter and owner, and have a child in private school…does that mean I have no rights as a citizen and am I not counted as part of the community?

    I am sure you will find some way to belittle my thoughts and statements and continue to try to push down ANYONE who goes against your personal political agenda and the agendas of your pals. Good luck to you and your career, that seems to be what you are most concerned with.

  • http://design.sergiosandino.com Sergio

    Also, consider that a parent might elect to send their child to a charter or private school because the public school in their districts may not be the best choice for them. People should not be excluded from voicing opinion simply because they are fortunate enough to be able to afford private schooling. It’s a ridiculous argument made by frightened people.

  • Tine

    Last time I checked, charter schools were part of the public education system.

    It is most unfortunate that McCann consistently keeps resorting to personal attacks on individuals instead of discussing the issues at hand. Thank goodness he did not get elected!

  • Tricia

    I don’t agree with u folks, I don’t see why we need to spend money we don’t have on this search, but Mr. McCann is a convicted felon. I don’t want him talking for us. He’s un Christian

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=tkAPAAAAIBAJ&sjid=N4YDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5244,3026826&dq=gerald+mccann+conviction&hl=en

  • mp

    Well said, Sergio!

    @Jerry- Your remarks are indeed shameful! I mean really? Really?? You really just made a statement about someone’s personal life and would dare to mention her child or personal experience in any way in your commentary? What’s scary is that it must not be out of character for you, given that you had the gall to sign your full first and last name… AND that you deem yourself fit to represent our city in any way while behaving this way publicly? Not the civic leader I would ever want to expose my children to, that’s for sure.

    Your remarks are also without logic- see Stephanie’s point. You are attacking someone because you claim her child doesn’t go to a public school, yet, you don’t even have school-aged children! I’m sorry, but that is just stupid. In any event, people with children in the PS system are not the only ones with a stake in this. Our entire community is affected by how well our children do- they are the greatest resource we have as a society. Wouldn’t you want every JC resident to feel a responsibility and duty to ensure we do the best we can for them? Shouldn’t we be widening the tent, not trying to weed out people who want to join the fight for better schools, all based on irrational distinctions? Which I repeat, if applied, would weed YOU out.

    As for the numbers, I think the 30 NYC failing schools actually came from a pro-Epps speaker who was trying to manipulate statistics to say we have the same number of failing schools as NYC… leaving out the fact that there are 43 TIMES the number of schools in NYC. If you think 30 is too low for the number of failing schools in NYC, would 1,000 be more accurate? That is the number of schools that would have to be failing in NYC for us to be at the same level (1,600 schools in NYC according to DOE website).

    Finally, you are right, some of us don’t usually attend these meetings. And I’m sure your bullying and inapproproiate personal attacks are designed to ensure we don’t come back. I hope that you have failed in your attempts. I, for one, will remain engaged and hope that many parents will continue to join me. It’s time for everyone to step up and take ownership of our most valued asset, our children.

  • http://design.sergiosandino.com Sergio

    @Tricia: I understand your concern about spending money we don’t have…but I ask a couple of questions:

    - WHY don’t we have the money…where is it going?

    - Doesn’t it seem that an almost 300K salary for ONE MAN is a waste of money, given that his performance is on the decline and the schools are failing? Better to keep things status quo than challenge ourselves to POSSIBLY find something better?

    The money’s there all right…and it’s being spent under our noses.

  • Matt Schapiro

    Frankly — the saddest part of the last few meetings for me was the candid admission of defeat by the pro-Epps crowd, ‘The schools are bad, but look around: the kids are bad, the parents are bad. Better is impossible and that’s not Dr. Epps’ fault.’

    The problem is, this approach does not allow for any improvement in our public schools until all parents magically start parenting better and kids start magically doing better. But this isn’t magic. Pedagogy is a science; and as Moshe Rosenblit said at the meeting on Wednesday, there are many school districts similar in problems to ours (D.C., NYC, etc.,) but who have improved their results dramatically with new, innovative superintendents pursuing new, innovative ideas.

    The shifting rationale and constant attacks by the pro-Epps crowd also illuminates what little substance they have behind their position.

    As I said at the meeting, I’m willing to believe that Dr. Epps might be the best man for the job. But there is literally no way to know that without a comparison to one or more other qualified candidates. Even Dr. Epps candidly admitted that a search would be a good idea in the JJ story from the meeting (found here: http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/2010/08/race_is_forefront_at_public_he.html) — “After the meeting, Epps said he had no problem with the board conducting a national search. ‘I think a national search is a good thing,’ he said.”

    That says it all. Dr. Epps knows the best way for him to be perceived as the right person for the job is to be fairly compared with others. I agree; and I continue to wonder why the board doesn’t.

  • Jerry McCann

    Who are all you people kidding. You are all tools of Steve Fulop. Everyone of you. He was exposed for the candidate he already had waiting in the wings. I mentioned their names. Let’s see someone challenge with it. Steve didn’t. His candidate who met with Sue Mack who even admits it told me she had four votes. All supporters of Steve Fulop. Why would she lie. She is a FULOP campaign worker.

    Dr. Epps does not have any say in the charters schools. So why were the charter school parents there. They were told to be there.

    I served on the Board of Education and while Mayor built PS #28 and #17. I sued along with the Mayors of Newark and Paterson to create the funding for new schools and early childhood education. You people have done absolutely nothing with the exception of Stephanie who helped start a charter school.

    Matt all you did was get your house fixed for nothing. Please don’t tell me that they did a nationwide search and found your house and Shelley’s home to do $10,000 of free repairs.

    When you lose this how many of you will be concerned about the school system. The answer is very obvious to everyone there. You never cared before and will never care in the future. Most of you will never achieve what I have achieved for the school system in Jersey City in one day in your lifetimes.

    My children have graduated from Brown, Columbia, MIT with honors. Lauren graduated with a perfect GPA with a PhD in Math (Operations Research). She does cancer research for Glaxo-Smith Kline. Tara is a Director at an investment bank in NYC. Elizabeth is a school teacher after being an ARMY interrogator in Arabic. Segio and MP most likely do not have any kids or at least none they are proud of since they don’t mention it. I have two grandchildren living in Jersey City that are 2 and 4.

    Intellectually Matt and his friends are not in the same universe as my family and never will be. None of you are bragging about your children because you can’t. You are failures and your children will not fall far from the tree.

  • Jerry McCann

    Assume you lose this. None of you will get involved with the school system. You came to your one meeting in your lifetime. Most people downtown will be living somewhere else in 12 months. Go to the Hudson County Board of Elections. Every election there are literally thousands of sample ballots being returned because people have moved from Downtown. There is not stability except for the ten supporters Steve has that may live here in three years. In the past three years over 10,000 registered voters from Downtown moved. When their children reach grammar school age most will move. You are temporary residents and you want to dictate to people who have been here for 50 years.

    You just want your way. You believe you are logical and smart. Most of you are very, very dumb. My prediction is the vote will be 9-0. You do not have allies. You elected politicians that will act like everyone before them.

    Why were none of you opposed to the $140 million in increased costs to the taxpayers of Jersey City in the next four years by the FULOP team. He is a POLITICIAN.

  • Jerry McCann

    “In the nation’s largest school system, with 1.1 million students, 78,000 teachers, and 1,450 schools,

    This was Bloomburg’s quote. The reason that the website may have 1600 schools is because some high schools have within their buildings many different programs and thus change the name of the school to reflect that. We do the same thing but call it the same name. They have 40 times more students.

    I said she lied because she did. She just made it up. She had no problem with it and she brought her child. You guys are defending her by attacking me. She was your representative. She lied like most of the rest of you. You cannot handle the truth. Many of you hide behind your “names” because you could not possibly expose yourself. At least I give matt and Stephanie credit for using their own names. Sergio just moved to Kearny.

    Sergio likes others makes up the salary. There is no housing allowance and no driver but why do you people care with the facts. There is no one coming to Jersey City to change the attitude of parents who do not care. There is no one coming to Jersey City to change students who want to join the gangs. This is the real world. Move to Summit their graduates just killed an innocent man sitting on a park bench for no reason whatsoever.

    Most of you do not care. You spend your time reading my posts. That is how stupid many of you are.

  • Jerry McCann

    Sergio, you can have an opinion. Must we agree with it because it is yours. Why do you believe that there is a national search even suggested. Schundler provided Fulop with the lawyer to sue. Schundler’s Charter school was abandoned by Schundler right after he left Jersey City as Mayor. Schundler called personally a number of board members and told them that he had resumes for Superintendents in his office. How did that happen so quickly? Right after Fulop sued. You see this is and always has been a conspiracy between Fulop and Schundler as evidenced by Schundler meeting with Fulop right after he was picked to become the Commissioner. Shelley Skinner Fulop’s #1 supporter was on the Christie Education transition team. How did that happen since she has ZERO background in education? How did then Christie pick Schundler? How did Fulop end up with Schundler’s lawyers? THERE IS NO NATIONAL SEARCH.

    The most recent national search was for Schundler. The last national search for a Superintendent by a Republican Governor resulted in Elena Scambio who was the Republican Essex County Superintendent who never ran a school district. She took over and grades went down every single year.

  • Alb

    I still don’t see anyone giving specific ideas about what Epps is doing wrong, or right, or, in the case of Jerry McCann, what we really should be doing to change things.

    I think the anti-Epps people would look a lot more credible here if there were, at the very, very least, some kind of report that described parents’ observations about what, as specifically as possible, is going wrong with day-to-day management of the schools.

    Are substitute teachers in classrooms for months at a time? Are there teachers cussing at or hitting small children? Are there schools in which a high percentage of the classrooms are completely out of control? Are there signs that some principals are really AWOL? Can we did up any actual examples of people with no-show JCBOE jobs?

    I think Jerry McCann would look more credible if he stopped obsessing about how Shelley got her house re-done (hint: there’s a TV show about it) and told us what he would do if he were us. So, we’re doing the wrong thing. What’s the right thing?

  • Tricia

    Mr. McCann. You like to talk but who are you speaking for? Not me I hope. I’m probably “not intellectually in your universe” either and neither are my kids, but I certainly don’t want you to know who or where they are so you can go after my little ones like you’re doing here to others simply because you didn’t get voted in. I don’t agree with them either but I don’t want a criminal talking for me or my beliefs. You talk about being better than me an your kids are gown up. it sounds like you just want a job running things.

    Sergio. Can you show me where his salary is published? i don’t know where the money is going, but why are we wasting more? if the big deal is it’s not right, then why don’t we deal with what we got and fix it?

  • Stepan

    Thanks Jerry.

  • http://www.jerseycityindependent.com Jon Whiten

    @Tricia-

    Here is the proposed contract, with the salary figures — http://www.scribd.com/doc/35676193/Proposed-Epps-Contract

  • Jayson

    Full disclosure, I have no idea who Jerry McCann is or if this is him or a puppet. (Puppet) Jerry is correct in many of the things he says and his points do contain insight despite its contemptuous delivery. The downtown people are much more affluent and therefore more mobile than the rest of Jersey City. They are much more likely to place their kids in private or charter schools and much more likely to leave once their kids reach school age. This ability to avoid the local problems will lead to very few people squandering time at BOE meetings.

    Thus, who attends these meetings? You can bet that every person with a direct financial stake will be there which explains the teachers and politicians. There are those whom they can manipulate which explains the students (who are probably the children of those with a direct financial stake). And there will be a few genuinely concerned parents there for the first time like “Jerry” says. Thus, without fanfare, Epps was not burned at the stake and the paper war continues.

    “Jerry” does miss a few points and makes several half-truths defending his point that this battle is lost. One point is that there has been a major demographic shift in downtown which is giving the old guard migraines. A blossoming educated crowd is becoming more involved. Let’s hope they are affluent enough to live downtown and not affluent enough to leave. This will keep them engaged in local politics. It is also a demographic that creates and supports websites such as this that shine lights in areas where cockroaches live and forces them to come out of hiding and defend themselves publicly.

    A second point is the severity of the recession we are in. People are *much* more defensive over money today than they were three years ago. Epps contract is a ghastly tribute to generosity of our public servants to themselves. Yes, Epps may win this time, but the economy is still faltering and more issues will bring out more people. Enough to turn the tide? Who knows.

    To me, the most fascinating and revealing thing is the hornet’s nest that was uncovered by this attempt to remove a single unremarkable superintendent. His career isn’t stellar, his salary isn’t deserved, a better candidate could easily be found without looking nationally, and he could never qualify for such a job anywhere else. If we were to halve his salary to a poverty level $130K, he would lick his wounds and take it because it’s better than anything he could get outside this political circle.

    This sheer amount of inexplicable political unity is clearly defending much more than just a superintendent.

  • Michelle

    I am absolutely shocked at the comments made by Jerry McCann!

    I have lived in Jersey City since 1996 and worked at PS 25, 42, and finished at MS 4. Some of my favorite teaching moments happened at these schools and EVERYDAY I went to work to care! It makes me sick to think that these comments are coming from a representative of an institution I worked so hard for and believed in.

    By allowing so many schools to continue to fail, we are saying as an entire community, “WE DONT CARE”. If we dont care, why should the teachers, why should the BOE, why should Dr Epps???? I am so proud of all the parents who were at the meeting to show that they care! And you should be too Jerry!!!

    DC Public Schools is a great model for us to follow. It was taken over by Chancellor Rhea in 2009. She is very radical and I say– get her here! or someone like her… We need to rethink, restructure, and hold every single person at the JCBOE to the highest standards. Accountability needs to start now and it needs to start with getting rid of people who act and think like Jerry McCann!

  • Sterling Waterman

    As a parent who has been a resident of JC for the last 17 years, I am appalled at the sheer tone this particular subject has undertaken . It doesn’t seem as if many care about the actual problems that exist in our schools. Most important to many is WHO IS ON WHAT SIDE.. When did we stop taking the children into consideration?

    My son has been in the school system since pre-k and is going to the 3rd grade. PS 16, the school he has attended since pre-k has gone on the list of failing schools for the first time and is apparently following a trend for many of our schools in JC. I have been involved in the school system for years as a member and the president of my PTA/PTO. I have also been a member of the School Leadership Committee, a member of the educational group called PCUE. I also founded a PTA/PTO President Coalition Group in 2008 and which I continued in 2009 to the present. All the while, I have known and battled with Dr. Epp’s, the school board members and many of the inherent problems of the schools. For anyone to throw me into a group and base my decisions or ideals on anything but my own experiences or that of others I represented is an insult and unfair. If I happen to be likeminded with people on a particular subject matter, then so be it. Take it for what it is. I do not have to defend myself or the fact that I want the best for my son and all of the children of Jersey City. I have always gone above and beyond for children before I came to JC, while the President of my parent group @ ps 16 and hopefully as a Board Member.

    If we throw away the insults, innuendos, semantics and affiliations regarding this matter, we still have major problems with the school system that are not getting better. 35 out of 40 failing schools is not a laughing matter dsepite how fair the process is. Further, It’s not fair across the country yet others in similar demographics are faring better even in our own school system..

    Despite the few accomplishments of 10 years of Dr. Epp’s leadership, like uniforms, we generally have an individual that is not accountable to the public or BOARD MEMBERS, This is nothing new. I have heard this from many of the board members before I got elected and see it for myself now. To be truly effective, we must all work together, which won’t necessarily happen now. Some of the board members will not admit certain problems we encounter, with the superintendent, in public, but I most certainly will. Some of his supporters have this “if it ain’t broken, don’t try to fix it” mentality. I will say this “IT IS BROKEN”

    Jerry, I respect you. We ran against each other and were cordial to one another. You’ve recently made some assumptions about me which are untrue and I have no problem with disclosure. I met this Cathy Coyle you mentioned at a fund raiser for Charles Mainor, the Assembly man. Not at the request of anyone, including Steve Fulop. I had no idea who she was prior and made no commitment afterwards for she never asked me for anything nor has anyone else. This, I would be put my hand on a bible for.

    Why can’t we all have friendly, educated, children themed only, dialogue about this?

  • Alb

    A) McCann is wrong about Shelley. She’s been organizing efforts to try to improve the schools here for at least 5 years, and she’s been in charge of fundraising at LCCS for awhile. I think it’s inaccurate to suggest that she has no background in education.

    B) I think one issue we’re overlooking here is that the NJ Ask test is a crummy test that just got rescaled. Example: I think it’s pretty clear that LCCS is a good school full of bright kids of bright parents. Half of the eighth graders got into McNair last year. But, on some of the tests in some grades, the percentage of kids scoring at the advanced level is weirdly low in the most recent results, and much lower than in the previous year. I don’t think that’s because the LCCS kids suddenly forgot how to read; I think it’s because the test is flaky.

    But, anyhow: Sterling has had a child in P.S. 16, for example. Can’t he list one concrete sign of JCBOE mismanagement there? Or could Dan Levin describe one concrete sign of JCBOE mismanagement at P.S. 37? If the answer is: because a grand jury is involved, or there are libel issues, fine. But, if these folks and other reform movement parents can’t describe one thing that’s being mismanaged, how do we know there’s mismanagement?

    My own impression is that there are signs of obvious msmanagement and contracting fraud, such as lunches at JCBOE schools that ate much worse than at LCCS, a school with no negotiating power. If there are obvious signs of fraud or mismanagement, and the school reformers aren’t detail-conscious enough to notice them, then I think we school reformers have to recruit an experienced school evaluator who can go beneath the test results and notice the details. I’ve been asking for the details about what Epps is doing wrong since about 2005, and all I get is an “if I told you, I’d have to shoot you” look. Example: couldn’t Epps opponents round up some retired teachers who could talk candidly about how the schools are managed? If not, why not? Why are detailed criticisms so rare?

    If the problem is lack of time and skills, why not look around for journalism students at NYU or Columbia who need a project and ask them to do the interviews, or find a retired Star-Ledger reporter and pay him/her to do the interviews?

  • Jayson

    @Sterling – For a disinclined voter such as myself, you were an unknown on a ballot box about whom I had read mildly favorable things. I have to say that after reading your posts and quotes here and elsewhere that you are by far the most inspiring person in local politics and I am proud to have contributed to your election. Each time you give clearheaded responses from the heart and you give direction, vision, and hope.

    @Alb – Are you serious? One post above yours gives evidence, yet you ask for anecdotes.

  • Alb

    Here are the LCCS NJ ASK tests:
    http://education.state.nj.us/rc/rc09/dataselect.php?c=80;d=7115;s=960;lt=L;st=T&datasection=all

    The results show that, in grades 3 through 5 in 2008-09, only 4 kids scored at the advanced level in language arts. I don’t believe that those results make sense, given that the kids seem highly verbal, the reading test results are a lot better than the language arts results, and a high percentage of the kids score at the advanced level on the math tests, which are made up entirely of word problems. Even if you love tests and say Epps should go because of low test scores: at least cite some tests separate from the ASK/No Child Left Behind testing program. Pinning a major argument on one type of test score is not methodologically great.

  • sid

    Jerry wrote:
    “My children have graduated from Brown, Columbia, MIT with honors. Lauren graduated with a perfect GPA with a PhD in Math (Operations Research). She does cancer research for Glaxo-Smith Kline. Tara is a Director at an investment bank in NYC. Elizabeth is a school teacher after being an ARMY interrogator in Arabic…”
    “Intellectually Matt and his friends *are not in the same universe as my family and never will be*. None of you are bragging about your children because you can’t. You are failures and your children will not fall far from the tree.”

    Let’s hope they’re not in the same universe as Jerry McCann – in other words they are not CONVICTED FELONS. They don’t know the inside of a PRISON CELL intimately like Jerry does. And Jerry, will you please shut the fuck up about your kids. We are sick of hearing about them every time you open your mouth to speak. Notice that we never hear about their mother, but that’s for a different post.

    It’s about time that you get off the public payroll. Perhaps your three kids can support you? As a taxpayer I’m disgusted that I have to contribute to your JCIA salary, benefits and pension.

  • Alb

    Sterling: I guess I overlooked the post you posted right before mine.

    Anyhow: Could you describe three examples of how the JCBOE seems to be mismanaging any of the schools in the district, or the JCBOE offices?

    If you think the schools are mostly well-managed at a business level, what about obvious problems at the academic level?

    Do you see teachers stuck with using inexcusably dumb textbooks, lesson plans, etc., and, if so, could you give any details? Or, have you heard of Epps mismanaging the JCBOE staff?

    Even if, for whatever reason, you’re not in a position to make those observations, is there some way you could get get some “examples of how the JCBOE is messing up” from your friends, your son’s friends, etc.?

    The pro-Epps crowd seems to be relying heavily on vague generalities to support Epps.

    I sincerely believe that the people who have concerns about Epps and the rest of the JCBOE would be in a stronger position to raise those concerns if we had a list of 10 fairly specific things that are obviously within the JCBOE’s control and that the JCBOE is obviously handling worse than, say, LCCS, Golden Door or other Hudson County school districts are handling the same issues.

    Example: I don’t know whether it’s really all that easily within the JCBOE’s control if third graders who are growing up in dire poverty are proficient at reading. But I do know it’s within the control of the JCBOE to make sure third graders have gym class twice a week and get outside for recess at least once a day when the weather is decent.

  • Jerry McCann

    I guess you all know why New York is doing so well. The Mayor and the new Chancellor just dumbed down the tests. Even Sid could past the test now. I do not need to prove to anyone what I have done for the city which most of you will leave soon. As far as what happened to me since then until now I have always expressed my innocence. The two people who prosecuted me sit on the US Supreme Court and was the Homeland Security Director. Neither one had a stellar career. The trial attorney was the same one that went after Hillary Clinton for Alphonse D’Amato. He screwed up New Orleans. Luckily only God judges me and not some of you morons. Sid don’t have children the tests scores are low enough. SHELLEY HAD ABSOLUTELY NO BACKGROUND IN EDUCATION. I taught in three areas colleges and have two teaching licenses. I passed the CPA exam the first time I took it.

  • Jerry McCann

    Only two charter schools in Jersey City that has been tested is doing well. There have been five to six closures because of performance. In spite of what any of you supposed “educated” commentators want to believe, it is the parents that make the difference. A mother was just murdered in Jersey City by her boyfriend. He then killed himself. She was 29 and discovered by her 15 year old son who does not attend school. She was 13 when she got pregnant. Is that Dr. Epps fault? That boy is not going to Harvard. What universe is your minds living in? Do not tell me about DC. It will come out soon that they are either cheating, have teachers give out the answers or making eighth graders take fourth grade tests. You want your child to do well. Spend the time with them to assure it. Do not believe that like many “stupid” people that all you have to do is send you children to school and if they do not do well it’s the schools fault. If you are a DOPE, there is a pretty good chance your child will be a dope too. God help the children of some of these posters.

  • Jerry McCann

    Thank God Steve Fulop will never father a child.

  • Matt Schapiro

    Wow.

  • Chris

    What does the CURRICULUM look like in our schools? How often does it change before a teacher gets a chance to master the curriculum guides? How much academic freedom do our teachers have in their classrooms? Is the curriculum organically grown or developed by expensive consultants and then thrown into teachers hands with the threat of “do or die” and big brother at the BOE looking over their shoulders? Are our disaffected youth being “reached” with the books in the curriculum? What type of after school programs are offered – are there only NJASK themed “clubs” or do our students have the opportunity to learn through a variety of enriching programs that include the arts? How does the technology in our schools measure up to the technology of surrounding suburban schools? And what happens when that technology fails – does it get fixed in a timely fashion or sit in a classroom collecting dust? What about on-line courses for our high school students? What innovation has been seen under Dr. Epps reign? How long should one individual be in power? Would it be ok for Mayor Healy to run the city indefinitely? Change is good – not always welcomed, but good.

  • Alb

    @Everyone — Today, I read JCBOE lunch menus for the first time in about a year, and they look much, much more varied and much healthier than they did a couple of years ago. It seems as if Susan Solleder, the JCBOE food service director, listened to parents’ concerns and revamped the menus.

    @Chris – Great questions.

    @Jayson — In posts posted before Aug. 17, no one in this thread has posted any specific example of the JCBOE schools doing anything wrong based on anything other than test scores. Sterling Waterman, for example, says Epps is not accountable, but he doesn’t explain why he believes that.

    Obviously, the contract mess could be cited as an example of how and why Epps is not accountable, but I don’t think the contract mess has anything directly to do with whether the primary school reading curriculum is weak, whether the middle school math curriculum is weak, whether the teachers can keep order in the classroom, whether the janitors are skimming off the top, etc.

    I sincerely believe that someone like Sterling Waterman or Carol Lester can come up with a list of many specific signs of mismanagement in the JCBOE schools. Maybe the fact that no one has posted a list here is a sign that the subject is such a political hot potato that answering it will result in immediate political self-destruction. But my guess is that the problem is just that people haven’t been pressed to make the kinds of lists I’m asking for.

    Whether Epps is in charge or Schundler’s hand-picked successor is in charge, someone has to figure out how to describe specific examples of what’s going wrong in the schools, not just mutter about how terrible it all is or enthuse about beautiful, abstract goals.

    If we can’t even express the thought, “The cafeteria at P.S. 5 looks like a dungeon; someone should paint it,” in words, how can we expect Epps, Schundler’s hand-picked successor to Epps, or anyone else to get the cafeteria painted?

    And, if we can’t express our criticisms of the schools in a concrete fashion, how can we expect our children to write essays for the N.J. ASK writing test in a well-organized, concrete fashion?

  • http://www.ohreallyoreilly.com/ Peter O’Reilly

    Jerry McCann, whom was former Mayor of Jersey City and most recently voted out of the Jersey City Board of Education, with no kids currently in public school and whom incidentally spends a lot of time recently hanging around St. Peter’s prep, a private school, wrote: “The funny thing is the ones who want the national search are totally political people. These are not concerned parents or we would have seen them before at meetings.”

    To Stephanie’s point, why are you so interested in such topic? Many of the Epp’s supporters whom turned out at such meeting had something at stake , i.e. jobs of patronage.

    I’m a concerned parent of two children in the Jersey City public school district (e.g. not a charter school), never have ran for political office, with no political connections, do not receive a dime in public funds or contributions and incidentally I did attend this meeting as well as other such meetings in years past. I firmly support a national search. What is the school administration afraid of?

    If the Jersey City School district is really doing so well, then why has the district’s student enrollment been in ___steady___ decline over the past decade? And why is it the School Superintendent’s yearly compensation has steadily increased over such time? Jersey City’s population is increasing, but parent are pulling their kids of of the school system en mass.

  • Really Jerry? (redux)

    Reprinted again, from an earlier article…

    Before anyone believes a word written by Jerry McCann, let’s go over a few facts.

    Fact #1 – McCann is none other than Inmate 11531-050. That’s right, Jerry is a convicted felon! You can check out inmate 11531-050 here –> http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/LocateInmate.jsp
    enter “Gerald Mccann ” (GERALD MCCANN 11531-050 60-White-M 02-17-1995 RELEASED )

    Fact #2 – McCann apologized in the Jersey Journal for “overzealous campaign workers” after the McCann campaign cut the elevator wires in the public housing to suppress the vote when he ran for mayor.

    Fact #3 – McCann was arrested for DWI after his release from federal prison.

    Fact #4 – McCann was featured in the New York Times for preying on senior citizens to get votes.

    So this is the Jerry McCann that embarrassed his family and the entire city and now resorts to political deals to get a job in the Incinerator Authority, of course he will protect the status quo.

    When will Mccann learn that his style of misleading information no longer works? Lots of people saw that home renovation game show between 3 neighbors on HGTV. The real fact is that participating in a game show to compete in house renovations is not wrong, nor improper, and as a matter of fact is a good thing for the city. And of course McCann gave dumpster tickets to the campaign manager of someone who was running against him in the Board of Education elections – thanks for putting it out there for everyone to see.

  • Jayson

    @Alb – You’re posts and ideas have been quite good, I see you are much more involved than I am.

    That said, I think you set the bar too high. Proven mismanagement is something that happens to mid-level management and lower. At the senior level and lofty rates for which Epps is retained, we have a right to demand excellence. As Michelle mentioned above, we could recruit the likes of Chancellor Rhee from DC *give her a raise* and get changes like she made there: “Over a two-year period, moved students scoring on average at the 13th percentile on national standardized tests to 90 percent of students scoring at the 90th percentile or higher.” Although a disputed tagline on her resume, you will not see anything like this on our superintendent’s CV. Not good enough is a good enough reason for termination.

    Further, schooling metrics like we’d all love to see are widely considered blasphemous. If one gets posted, it would quickly be undermined. I’m certain that the kind of mismanagement smoking gun you are asking for doesn’t exist thus the hand-waving and muttering you see everywhere. That’s politics. Your desires for a clean cut discussion over facts comparing metrics are quaint, but will never happen…then again I’d love to be proven wrong.

  • Alb

    @Jayson – I understand that parents probably can’t post here about Company X getting a crooked, no-bid contract from Epps.

    And I think another challenge is that the downtown JCBOE grade schools are decent schools. They look bad to us because LCCS is so wonderful, not because the downtown JCBOE schools are so terrible.

    But my impression from talking to the kids is that there schools in the city that are much worse. The question is: are they functioning OK, just with seriously messed up kids, or are they poorly run zoos?

    I think the goal here should be to get Joseph Ramos, the former principal of P.S. 5 who went to Guttenberg, or maybe the former principal of P.S. 3 – intelligent, caring people who were inside the belly of the beast and are now outside — and interview them to find out what they think.

    Maybe, come to think of it, the person posting here under the name Jerry McCann is implying that Schundler wants to put Ramos in charge of the Jersey City schools. Whether that’s true or not: why not treat Ramos as a serious candidate, if he’s interested, and ask him what he’d do if he had a magic wand and were allowed to use it on the JCBOE schools?

    Also, I really think anyone who’s volunteered iin any school ought to be able to describe some aspects that need improvement.

    Example:

    - My high school – Too easy for bright kids; math didn’t go up past Calculus AB. The principal (this was back in 1981) had no idea what I was talking about when I said the calculus class ought to be an AP calculus class.

    - My college – My math professor scribbled on the chalkboard without seeming to have any concern about whether students could see what was going on on that chalkboard. I could understand math just fine, but I had big problems with chalkboards.

    - LCCS – If I were a better human being, I’d go sweep near the walls in the gym and in the hallways in the basement, and the young adult novels should be much better alphabetized. I’m not sure whether the school offers enough formal instruction in English grammar.

    - P.S. 5 – The loudspeaker was so scratchy that the kids had no idea what the national anthem really sounds like, and the school is generally hell on the parents. The kids seem happy, but the parents have no idea how to make an after care payment or find an administrator to answer questions or cut through red tape. And there are about 50 pages of forms to fill out at the beginning of the year. I always felt as if I was one missed blank on a form away from getting my kid kicked out of school. And someone told me that the school no longer teaches cursive handwriting; teachers have to sneak the subject in.

  • http://www.ohreallyoreilly.com/ Peter O’Reilly

    @Alb: Sterling Waterman, for example, says Epps is not accountable, but he doesn’t explain why he believes that.

    In 2006, KMPG did an audit of the school district. They found significant financial controls lacking. For instance there were dead people still on the payroll a year later. There were also janitors racking up $100,000+ in overtime, year after year. They would submit time sheets for 23 hours of work per day. All of this theft had the tacit approval of the school board.

    Dr. Epp’s wrote a 2 page letter promising that they would correct such measures. He was even then praised by then State Ed Commish L. Davy, just 6 months after the release of the audit report for doing a wonderful job with non other than managing school finances. Politics at play for sure.

    Fast forward to the present, if you look at the data provided by the State Department of Education, you will see that little has changed. Maintenance staff salary and benefits for the school district are in the 97th percentile for the State.

    That’s just one concrete, factual example demonstrating the lack of accountability of the leadership in the school district.

  • Stepan

    I am so tired about hearing that McCann was convicted. I get the point already. While I would normally not support someone like him, he was most educated in the BOE debates and seems to be most educated here. Everyone here has only one argument against him (which isn’t really relevant) and you keep repeating it over and over again.

  • Alb

    @PeterO’Reilly — Thanks. I do remember the audit, and I think the audit was the source of the “$100 million in unaccounted for spending” figure.

    My recollection is that the audit report was a pain to read and that it was hard to find the good stuff. I think it would be good if the reform folks could go through the report in a serious way and come up with a list of “top 10 operational/management problems that are clearly Epps’ responsibility.”

    It still think it’s also important to get observations of problems from parents, teachers and students (or former teachers and students), to corroborate what was in the audit and translate it into stories about real-world impact.

    To some extent, it seems as if an audit might be look like test results. I know that there’s a high risk that any urban district, even one that’s pretty well run, will have weak test scores. My suspicion is that there’s also a high risk that even a reasonably well-run urban district will have problems getting a clean bill of health in an audit. It seems as if running a big school district is a messy business. If the books of a big school district were super clean, that might be more evidence that the district had cooked up artificially clean books than that it was actually super clean.

    But if, say, P.S. X is a school where the janitors earn $100,000 per year due to overtime, and we see that the janitors are sitting around all day smoking, letting the building decay around them, then it seems as if that’s the sort of thing that could get people’s attention.

  • Riaz Wahid

    Can the Board Members answer these questions:

    - What kind of results, the Board is expecting from Dr Epps in 2010-2011?
    - Why is Dr Epps qualified to achieve those results ?
    - Why is Dr Epps NOT qualified to achieve those results ?

    I am a Tax Payer and have two kids in Public Schools.

    Jon/Shane: Can you get these answers and publish here ? Thanks

  • http://onejerseycity.org Dan Levin

    @ Alb – I get what you are getting at – is the BoE to be held accountable for the failures of impoverished / at-risk children and their parents/caregivers? I say yes, we have no choice. We are all affected. As a community, we cannot continue to accept the results of current efforts and must try and try again to seek out solutions.

    What are Dr. Epps and the BoE doing wrong? It is quite simple; the critics are demanding that Dr. Epps and the BoE be held accountable for not improving test scores and failing to meet No Child Left Behind standards. If Dr. Epps cannot improve test scores, they want to bring in an expert who will.

    The position of superintendent is clearly a political position and the monster of a budget is an attractive beast to control. Of course there are politics playing out …

  • Alb

    @Riaz – I think it would be fair to ask school board members to describe the specific metrics other than test scores that they’re using to assess Epps, and to tell us how Epps is doing in terms of those metrics. We mostly don’t have the time or energy to walk into schools and see if the classrooms are under control, children with serious behavioral problems are dumped in classrooms without aides, etc., but school board members should have the time to find out about the specifics, not just ramble on about test scores.

    @Dan – I think the language you’re using is too general here to turn into goals. Asking Epps “to be accountable to improverished/at risk children” is sort of like fighting poverty or fighting for justice. Even the nastiest, greediest, most evil people among us would probably say they want to fight poverty and fight for justice. The question is, “How?”

    I think that, instead of asking, “Is Epps accountable?” or “Are the test scores good?”, we ought to make lists of very concrete metrics that Epps or a principal very obviously has the physical ability to physically control, such as whether kids get outside for recess on nice days, whether most of the toilets in the bathrooms work, whether the classrooms are reasonably well under control, whether the third grade reading textbook is a textbook that has worked well in other urban school districts, and (somewhat more abstractly) whether the eighth graders who get into McNair end up feeling as if they were pretty well prepared in grade school for what they experience in McNair. When kids from our high schools get into a state university, or some other university that will report back to us, how do they do?

  • http://www.ohreallyoreilly.com/ Peter O’Reilly

    The Jersey City School District, as a whole, performs more poorly than the Statewide average for the most handicapped assessment testing cohort, the economically disadvantaged. That fact is still true when you consider it includes Jersey City’s brightest students, which are many, including McNair students.

    More regarding Sterling’s point about a lack of accountability. There is no formal job description for the Board of Education. And that is intently so – A Board of Education is suppose to look out for the students interests, keeping in check the Superintendent.. Not work hand in glove with the Superintendent whom doles out jobs of patronage (that folks like Gerry McCann, his real motive, bend over backwards for).

    While we are at it there’s no public oath of office to be found and no rules of ethics to follow (Don’t laugh. I know this is Hudson County). The Superintendent and School Board members have willingly and repeatedly broke State ethics rules within the past 5 years. They do so knowing there’s no accountability and that the current ethics rules are basically toothless. One pays a bigger penalty for jaywalking.

    It is a $600+ million budget, mostly funded by the State taxpayer (75%), with little financial control and oversight. Hiring of teachers and administrative staff are done solely at the discretion of the School District Superintendent.

    The Superintendent and the Board of Education do not set any public goals or objectives for the coming school year, let alone a 5 year plan. The Superintendent and the 6 Board members whom support his contract don’t open their mouths to the public nor the press when asked why his contract should be renewed. This includes refraining from listing any accomplishments they may have achieved; they do not even go through the trouble of making a point to sell themselves.

    You will not find a listing of: job descriptions, mission statement, goals, objectives and concrete achievements (e.g. measurable & verifiable) on the jcboe.org website. The same is true for the communication that is mailed to public school parents and the notices stuffed in their kid’s backpacks. Meaningfully substantive communication and any modicum of transparency is lacking from the Board of Education and the School Superintendent.

    Students get a report card every quarter; for the administration there’s none to be found. Nothing is defined it’s hard to be held accountable.

    If a steady decline in the district’s student enrollment over the past decade is not an ugly enough picture for you. What’s expressed above should more fully illustrate such point.

  • Matt Schapiro

    @Alb

    With respect, you seem to be missing the forest for the trees here. What most pro-search advocates ARE NOT SAYING is that Dr. Epps is doing a terrible job and therefore must be replaced. What most pro-search advocates ARE SAYING is that the record and accomplishments of Dr. Epps should be measured against the record and accomplishments of one or more qualified candidates before his contract is renewed.

    If he is judged by members of the BoE at that point to be the best candidate then so be it. But there is no reponsible way to judge whether he should continue without exploring legitimate alternatives. Otherwise it’s just a rubber stamp, and an obvious one at that.

    Dr. Epps himself has publicly recognized that a search is the right thing to do as he knows that he will be viewed by many as illegitimate without one. For this reason alone it makes sense for the BoE to hold off on his new contract until a search is held.

  • McCann Supporter

    Jerry is smarter than everyone of you. Those facts reported are not all true. The cable cutting is a total lie created than by Cunningham and the preying on seniors was created by Healy. None of those things happened except by his opponents lies.

    Peter, most of the overtime at that time involved the moving of the school equipment and renovations that the district decided to do in house rather than by outside contractors. They came up against the start of the school year so they did most of the work on overtime. The person in charge of facilities on the Board was Sue Mack who it appears most of you support because she agrees with you.

    FACT – He was elected four times in Jersey City
    FACT – He did more for Jersey City than anyone in the last 50 years
    FACT – His children are more intelligent than any family that ever lived in Jersey City including all of you
    FACT – He is more dedicated to children in Jersey City than all of you combined. You ahve no idea what he has done
    FACT – Fulop is what he is

  • http://www.ohreallyoreilly.com/ Peter O’Reilly

    Moving?

    More like painting and were not talking Picasso’s here:

    http://www.talkingpolitics.net/School%20janitors%20OT3.jpg

    Note: the article if form 2006. More than 3 years later, the ***excessive** over time issue is still a problem and all fingers point to the person ultimately responsible, the School Superintendent, not the Chair of Facilities. He calls the shots. I know having talked directly to both of them.

    ALL EYES ON OVERTIME
    District plan: Closely monitor maintenance workers’ hours
    Wednesday, December 20, 2006
    By JARRETT RENSHAW
    JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

    The Jersey City School District yesterday laid out its plans to curtail millions of dollars in overtime from the maintenance department following a blistering state audit that raised questions about the validity of the overtime as well as the district’s apparent lack of oversight.

    The overtime audit, released in October, was performed after the state noticed a $2.1 million spike in overtime pay in the district’s maintenance department between the 2004-05 and 2005-06 school years. Overall, overtime pay went from $5.2 million to $7.4 million.

    For example, Kristopher Keating, a high school custodian who is paid roughly $50,000 annually, netted more than $163,000 in overtime during the past two years, while another custodian, Ben Smith, netted roughly $93,959 in overtime during last year alone. The two employees ranked as the two biggest overtime earners in the state report.

    Following the release of the audit, the district had 60 days to come up with what is called a corrective action plan to address the questions raised in the state report. The district plan was laid out yesterday during a finance committee meeting, and the school board is expected to approve the plan at tomorrow night’s board meeting.

    “I welcome audits. Though we were disappointed with the report, we attacked this head on,” school board chairman William DeRosa said. “If these are the only problems, then I am happy.”

    School District Superintendent Charles T. Epps Jr. called the details of the report “appalling.”

    The state report highlighted one employee who was paid for 80 consecutive hours of overtime and another who was paid for working five 20-hour days in a row. The overtime records showed no breaks for lunch or sleep and the report labeled it and a number of other similar instances as “unrealistic” and/or “excessive.”

    The state report showed much of the overtime was taken without the required approval of supervisors in the district. In a test sample of 16 employees’ overtime records, state auditors found that 284 of 381 – or 75 percent – lacked the required approval from a supervisor.

    The district will require all maintenance employees to seek written approval from supervisors before working overtime. The written request must include a listing of the tasks expected to be completed.

    The district also hopes to have an automated system in place by March that will include multiple levels of approval. In addition, maintenance employees will be forced to call in and out using district phones – equipped with caller ID – to help properly document the time worked.

    [Note the following, "McCann Supporter"]:

    One board member expressed frustration at what she says is the lack of action taken by the administration.

    “We come in here and talk a lot about plans, but I am not confident that they are going to be implemented,” said school board member Suzanne Mack.