Jersey City Farm Employing Former Prisoners May Have to Find New Location After Land Dispute

By • Sep 16th, 2011 • Category: Featured, Food, News
LinkedInDeliciousDiggRedditStumbleUponPrintFriendlyShare

Less than half a year after it began tending to an earth box farm on Kearney Avenue, it appears the Friends of the Lifers Youth Corporation will soon have to find somewhere else for its innovative farming program after a falling out with the Jersey City Redevelopment Agency (JCRA).

Taking on an urban farming project was a great fit for the Jersey City-based organization, which reintegrates former prisoners into society. The farm program helps individuals gain marketable employment skills while at the same time bringing fresh and healthy food to a Greenville community that desperately needs it (not to mention turning what was once a blighted empty lot into a working farm).

The Friends broke ground on the farm, which is on Kearney Avenue between Ocean Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, in May, and it recently began harvesting the bounty and selling it to local residents via an on-site farmers market. But now it says it is being “evicted” from the site by the JCRA. While the agency disagrees with this characterization, it seems clear that farm will have to find a new site.

Healy administration officials and the JCRA have pledged to help the group find a new home, but that did not prevent many of its members and leaders from speaking out at this week’s City Council meeting about what they say is an injustice committed against them by the JCRA.

“We’re being asked to remove our workers from the lot so the JCRA can initiate the same program with an outside organization not connected with the community,” Friends research analyst and program administrator Brooke Hansson said at Wednesday’s meeting. “There are many lots in the area — why are they taking this one?”

The disagreement boils down to exactly what Friends executive director Annette Joyner and JCRA executive director Robert Antonicello may have agreed to when the project was first conceived.

Joyner says the JCRA leader is reneging on his initial promises to give the Friends the previously vacant and blighted lot. She also says Antonicello is bringing new organizations — including the Jersey City Food Co-op and One City, a non-profit run by the JCRA — into the mix.

Perhaps not surprisingly, Antonicello remembers things differently. He says the JCRA never promised the land to the Friends, but rather allowed the group to operate there with the understanding that eventually other organizations would be involved. He says he initiated the project when he learned about a similar program in Newark called the Prodigal Sons and Daughters, and he wanted the JCRA to get involved with growing local organic produce that could be donated to the needy.

“100 percent of what One City raises goes to charity,” he says, adding that all operational costs are absorbed by the JCRA. “We always intended One City to be in charge of the program.”

He thought the Friends would be a great addition to the program, but says there was never any plan to donate the farm plot to the group.

“Why would we give away land when we wanted a farm there to be run by One City? The JCRA already owned the land; it wouldn’t make sense to give up the property only to look for some more elsewhere,” he says. “We wanted to get the Friends of the Lifers involved, but had no intention of giving them that lot.”

Everyone seems to agree that in February of this year, Antonicello brought Joyner — and city officials like planning director Bob Cotter and Ward F councilwoman Viola Richardson — to an urban greenhouse hydroponics farm in Orange, where Prodigal Sons and Daughters was growing organic produce to be both sold and donated.

Antonicello says that he expressed his interest in bringing a similar program to Jersey City, and that although he did not have a firm vision in mind at the start of the project, he’d hoped to bring in a number of different groups to work together on this project – a fact he says he made clear from the get-go.

“We had Jersey City Food Co-op on board to buy one-third of the produce, we wanted to have one-third of the produce donated, and one-third to be sold to whoever wanted to buy it,” he said of a plan he had suggested to Joyner.

But Joyner says she was not interested in working with either the Food Co-op or One City, since the Friends had already developed a working model and preferred to stick to that.

“They want to do what we’re doing already. We give crops to a food pantry, we’re selling produce to raise funds for our business so we can pay the food handlers that are working on our farm,” she says.

The JCRA, Joyner says, is trying to control how her company operated and failed to account for the Friends’ primary goal: to reintegrate ex-offenders into a community.

“Why would the Jersey City Food Co-op be a part of this when you have to buy a membership?” she asks. “Where does that fall into job creation? We’re employing a population of men and women who are hard to employ. Nobody wants to hire them. This was our model.”

In addition to the job training, workers at the Friends’ garden receive $240 each week as a stipend, which Joyner says is often used by ex-offenders to pay fines and to help put their lives back together.

One worker, 46-year old Mark Graham, spoke at this week’s council meeting, describing himself as “one of the faces of the program.” Saying that “job system failed me,” Graham pointed out that the organization was there when he had nowhere else to turn.

“I’ve served 16 years in prison. I came home three years ago and tried everything possible you can do. I got my high school diploma and a driver’s license,” he said, but he still was not able to find work. “The only thing there for me was this program. There are not too many things like this.”

Officials from the city, the JCRA and the Friends of the Lifers are set to meet soon to discuss where the group can move its farm.

Photo courtesy of the Friends of the Lifers Youth Corp



Like what you've read here? Please consider making a donation or becoming a sustaining member. As a grassroots news organization, we rely on community support -- as well as paid advertising -- to survive.

is a staff writer for the Jersey City Independent.
Email this author | All posts by

  • http://twitter.com/DouglasCarlucci Douglas Carlucci

    Seriously? I can think of ten large abandoned lots in that neighborhood off the top of my head. And a lack of greengrocers has been a consistent problem in wards A and F for decades. The JCRA should encourage the Lifers and do the same thing somewhere else. Why is it always a pissing match in Jersey City?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AGUECMI3RU23KJMRNIUDQZKQ5U RYAN

      The partnership that began at this site should coninue as originally planned with all groups who where at the table from the start. This project is still in the learning stages. Once the process is profected then these orgs. could branch off. If the branch off now this wonderful idea will fall to the wastside like most Ward F projects do.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AGUECMI3RU23KJMRNIUDQZKQ5U RYAN

    I witness the start of this project and was there as a help and witness from the start. I witnessed Freinds org, Food Co-op, my Coucil Woman, and JCRA at the site planning this. This is a caes of good intensions going bad. The lesson here is never do things without putting an agreement in writing. They should keep to the partnership discussed from the start and work together. This project is still in the learning stages.

  • Anonymous

    There are very significant facts to this story missing. JCRA was very excited about the parnership with Friends of the Lifers and thought this was a win win for the community. Bear in mind that many important items were not initially finalized i.e. how it would get funded exactly, who would pay for the training, who would pay for the permenant improvements (water supply & permenant flooring) and/ or who would pay for the greenhouse. JCRA only suggested additional collaborations as potenital funding sources or buyers of future harvests. JCRA has learned that when you do not have a permenant funding source, brillant visions fold. As such, great partnerships are sometimes positively altered or suggested to qualify for future funding sources. The JC Food Coop, at best, was only a potential buyer of future harvest to their Jersey City residents customers base. When the project was conceived, only a list of potential customers were discussed. During the first meeting to finally discuss our future strategy, Friends of the Lifers disagreed with the partnership and requested to be given their own site for an urban garden. JCRA worked closely with Friends of the Lifers to locate a site, which is one block from thier office. Since August, Friends of the Lifers agreed that the site was a great selection and began the process of securing the property. The next steps were that Friends of the Lifers work with the City of Jersey City on how to purchase or lease the site. It must be noted, that the current state of the urban farm with outdoor earth boxes is an interim training step towards ultimately building a permanent hydroponic greenhouse which requires us to clear the property once the harvest has matured and sold (which is upon us now) to prepare for construction. It is sometimes very important to be flexible when initially creating an organization so that you ensure the vision not only comes to life but that its strong.      

    • http://www.jerseycityindependent.com Jon Whiten

      frankyone: I understand where you’re coming from here, but felt the need to chime in since your comment seems to imply that we were less than fair with the piece. As an insider, you are privy to all of these facts of the situation from the agency’s side, but some of them were disputed by the other party in this story. And to keep it from devolving further into a “he-said, she-said” pissing match between two groups, we left a lot of that out. Instead, we felt like the best thing for us in this situation was to take a look at how miscommunication and other factors got in the way of what seemed like two different groups’ best-laid plans. I think we were fair to both the agency and the Friends, but of course you may feel differently. Thanks for your thoughts.

  • Anonymous

    As a trustee and member-owner of Jersey City Food Co-op, and
    speaking personally in an unofficial capacity, I think it’s disappointing that
    the leadership of the Friends of Lifers would manipulate the facts of our
    participation in the JCRA’s program at the Hub. 

    We were initially approached to participate in JCRA’s urban
    farming program at the Hub in September of last year, long before the meeting
    in February referenced in the article.  When
    we signed on to purchase produce from the program, the Friends of Lifers were
    not even mentioned and were not part of its initiation.  Their project is a beneficiary of committed resources,
    planning and discussions that predated their participation in JCRA’s
    program.  To suggest that we have suddenly
    arrived on the scene with the intent of taking over or duplicating their
    program is false. 

    We’re trying to open a store.  We have never had any intention of running a
    farm.  Our interest in the project has
    been to support a worthwhile local program by purchasing produce for distribution
    to our member-owners.   Our participation was never directly linked to
    job creation for the Friends of Lifers project, though that may have been the
    happy result of partnering with a group of people willing to buy their
    goods.   Perhaps Ms. Joyner doesn’t think that
    providing additional markets for the produce raised by her group would assist
    in sustaining her project and creating more opportunities for recruiting new
    participants, but that doesn’t make sense to me.

    We receive some of the best local and organic produce from
    New Jersey farmers through our partnerships with other cooperative
    organizations.   We were never in need of
    the products this farm would provide, and we never insisted upon a relationship.  We support local farmers and producers whose
    goods are produced in a manner consistent with our mission, and we are
    dedicated to strengthening our local economy and community.  We believed that this program was aligned
    with our mission and committed to promote and support it accordingly. 

    As a program started on JCRA’s property and with their
    funding and support, everyone’s participation was contingent upon their
    decision to move forward with the partners they chose to contribute to the
    effort.  If the program partners aren’t
    complying with the overall goals of the project, it seems to me that the JCRA
    has the right to sever the relationship at will.  If the Friends of Lifers feel that the JCRA
    has acted in bad faith, what could be gained by insisting on continuing that
    relationship through an extended tenancy? 

    We are not an “outside organization”.  Anyone can become an owner of the co-op and our ownership is comprised of people from all over the city, including Greenville.  Our mission was generated from conversations
    about food access in Ward F, which is where our founder, Gillian Allen, lives
    with her family.  Our first meeting was
    held in Greenville, as was our first fundraiser, which was held at Our Lady of
    Sorrows Roman Catholic Church on Ocean Avenue. 
    We split the proceeds of that fundraiser with the urban farm program created
    by the Dominican Sisters there to benefit neighborhood kids and the church’s
    food pantry.   

    We’re a fledgling organization, and as such, we have limited
    resources, but we have always prioritized opportunities for outreach.  Our member-owners have devoted a lot of their
    time and goodwill to building a working member organization from scratch, and I’m
    proud of their integrity and sense of community.    Our collective goal is to make good food and
    ethically produced goods available for everyone in all neighborhoods of the
    city, but especially for those in underserved areas.  We contribute to, and are dependent on, the promise
    of a healthy, thriving Jersey City.  We
    hoped that, through supporting our neighbors at the Hub, we could foster a visible
    symbol of how much we all can gain by working together to strengthen our
    community as whole.  I’m sorry that Ms.
    Joyner doesn’t share that vision.  

  • Anonymous

    Perhaps the most distressing
    mischaracterization that has surface since the release of this story
    is that idea this is somehow a “pissing contest”. This is crude
    and hides the dire reality that at Friends of the Lifers we are
    literally stabilizing and saving peoples lives. This is about
    peoples livelihoods, dignity and ability to provide for their
    families. This is also about a profound injustice. All this talk
    about partnerships and who had what meeting when. The fact of the
    matter is that Friends of the Lifers showed up with significant
    funding and actually executed what everyone else is still just
    sitting a talking about; we made an urban garden, we created jobs, we
    cleared blight and we are producing food on a formerly blighted lot
    that is one among nearly 30 in a 28 block radius. Yet somehow it is
    our organization that is being asked to leave or “encouraged to do
    it elsewhere”. We do not refuse to work with anyone; we refused to
    give our produce away. This is what we were being asked to do, to
    give our produce away. Nor did we mention or malign organizations
    that are now on the defense. We simply want to continue the project
    that we executed with full force and are asking loud and clear: Why
    are we being removed?     

    • http://www.jerseycityindependent.com Jon Whiten

      Brooke: You’re right on the “pissing contest” language, and I admit I hastily used that term in my comment below without really thinking about it. Apologies for that.